Don't be such a retard.
That movie was retarded.
This weather is retarded.
"I highly approve of Romney's decision to be kind and gentle to the retard." (Thank you, Ann Coulter, 2012.)
"If he’s ‘the smartest guy in the room’ it must be one retarded room.” (Thanks, again, Ann, 2012.)
According to some tests, Kieran, in the past, would have been labeled as "mentally retarded." In fact, it was this label that, after we received his diagnosis, caused my heart to sink into my stomach. It was this label that, as I scoured the Internet for information on Williams syndrome in those early days, caused me to continue to read page after page, searching for something that gave me hope that this wouldn't be his label for life.
Because I knew what came along with that label: teasing (Hey, look at that retard over there!), difficulty learning, intellectual delays -- in general, a life that wouldn't be easy.
That term, as a medical definition, has fallen out of use for precisely this reason -- the word retard is generally used in a derogatory way and those who would be labeled by it don't appreciate the association. So today, terms such as intellectual disability are used in its place.
I understand that the word retard is just that -- a word. But the reason it works as it does is because of the association it has with those who were (and are) considered "less than." Imagine the transitive property of equality (from math class) applying here:
Kieran = mentally retarded = whatever you're using that term to describe
When you say, "Man, that's so retarded," it's as if you're saying, "Man, that's so Kieran." And it doesn't seem to me that in this case you're talking about his good qualities.
The word retarded is usually used in reference to something that's dumb or stupid. But I know that Kieran isn't dumb or stupid. By now, I hope you know Kieran as an individual little boy -- a child who bears the image of His Creator and was created for His glory (Isaiah 43:7). You know he loves weed whackers, his favorite color (right now) is yellow, he enjoys singing, he likes to use the vacuum and steam mop, he's learning to read, he hugs everyone he meets, and he hates being outside (unless the temperature is in the 67-72 degrees range). He is kind, inquisitive, sensitive to the feelings of others, and likes to learn. You know that he's so much more than just the label of "mentally retarded." And the same is true for every single image-bearer who has ever been given a label like this. They are all individuals, created in the image of God, who have their own story to tell if we take the time to hear it.
And so, there's a movement that aims to "spread the word to end the word" about discontinuing the use of the R-word, and the national day of awareness this year is March 4 (today).
Now, I don't want to turn into the Politically Correct Word Police because that's not my point. It seems to me that perhaps there's a bigger picture that we're missing when we focus on just one word.
When individuals began to call out Ann Coulter on her derogatory use of the r-word in 2012, she responded with this:
"I used the word retard the same way people use idiot, cretin, moron and the rest of them which were all once technical terms and I had it with the language police."And she's right. Words such as idiot, moron, cretin, feeble-minded, imbecile were all, at one time, used as descriptions of those thought to be mentally deficient. (In fact, mental retardation was a replacement for some of these words because they came to be used in a derogatory way, just as intellectual disability now replaces mental retardation.)
I once saw a woman respond to someone's use of the r-word with, "I can't believe he would be such a moron!" It made me pause and re-evaluate what the campaign against the r-word was really about.
And, to me, it's about more than just not using one particular word. Because there are a plethora of words we can use in its place that accomplish the same thing: short-bussing it, sped (short for special education), spaz (which references someone with a seizure disorder), and the aforementioned moron, idiot, etc.
Elsewhere Ms. Coulter said:
"Retard has been used colloquially to just mean 'loser' for 30 years."When we call someone retarded, moron, idiot, not only are we demeaning the ones who bore that label, but we're doing it with the intent to demean the one we're referring to. And James warns us about this:
With [our mouth] we bless our Lord and Father, and with it we curse people who are made in the likeness of God. From the same mouth come blessing and cursing. My brothers, these things ought not to be so (James 3:9-10).In the book of Proverbs, we find that insulting someone is the same as insulting their Creator (Proverbs 14:31, 17:5).
Instead, as Christians, we are called to be champions of those with disabilities (Proverbs 31:8; Luke 14:13-14), including in the way we talk about them. And we are called to be careful with our words (Matthew 12:36) and to speak words that bring life to those who hear us (Proverbs 18:10, etc.).
If we truly -- and I'm saying this to myself because I admit to having used various of these words -- see each and every individual as an image-bearer of our kind, loving, generous, good Creator who creates everyone for His own glory and for our good, would we use words like these to describe them? It's true that we all certainly do unwise and foolish and stupid things at times as a result of our sin nature (Romans 3:23), but is there a difference between referring to someone as unwise (who goes against the commands of our Creator) and referring to them as a moron? Would we refer to their Creator as a moron? As an idiot?
The issue that, to me, transcends the use of the R-word is this: how do we view our fellow human beings? And how do we talk about -- and to -- them? Do our words -- all of our words -- honor our Creator and bring life to those who bear His image?
These are my reflections on the R-word. What are yours?

















